![]() |
|||
February/March 2009 |
Sustainability Strategy |
||
C O N T E N T SExecutive Director's Corner: Crossing The Potomoc LEED: Fort Carson Building Awarded First Army LEED Gold Neighborhood Development: LEED Neighborhood Development in Colorado Recyling News: Some Thoughts on Recycling Old Office Furnishings Sustainable Development: Creating a Sustainable Future Getting Green Done: Forgive Me Father, I Don't Have the Money Sustainable Strategy: Creating Effective Collaboration and Leadership Tactics Executive Director's Corner: Major Speaker Announced for May Conference Metro Branch Update: Denver Metro Branch is Looking for Volunteers VISIONPromote responsibility for Colorado's environmental legacy. MISSIONAdvance and promote sustainable planning, design, construction and operation of the built environment through education, improving industry guidelines, policy advocacy, and information and resource sharing. BOARD OF DIRECTORSDana Kose, Chair Jim Bradburn, Vice Chair, Chair Elect Megan Christensen, Secretary Sebastian De Atucha, Treasurer Clay Benson, Director at Large Mike Lowell, Director, Advocacy Bobby Molinary, Director, Membership Julie Edwards, Director, Education Matt Arabasz, Director, Northern Colorado Branch Joshua Radoff, Director, Resource Development, and Communications Bethany Trumble, Director, Southern Colorado Branch Liz Sharrer, Director, Metro Branch Mike Kolesar, Director, Emerging Green Builders Deb Kleinman, Executive Director
Colorado Building Green is the official newsletter of the U.S. Green Building Council – Colorado Chapter, and is published bi-monthly. If you are interested in submiting a story, ideas or other information for publication, please contact the editor at dgloffreda@msn.com |
Creating Effective Collaboration and Leadership TacticsRenewables, Sustainables and the Path to ProfitsBy Tracy Houston, Chairman of the Board, iCAST
In building a top of the line LEED Platinum Class A office product, the mapping often does not go deep enough beyond the LEED scorecard. Magnificent gains in worker productivity often trump the environmental and energy gains that are already realized. Go deeper still in the mapping process and realize these buildings generate huge profits when sold in a commercial real estate market overloaded with SUV-type structures. The car company executives are late to respond. The Class A office clients don’t hang on long enough to get the profit message. Context matters when an industry is evolving. Forming contextual intelligence is one of the advantages of mapping stakeholder concerns because it produces information to anticipate market changes and customer preferences. This approach and the data it is producing has driven the consumer goods industry for years. In fact, some of the larger consumer goods businesses are looking for “unanticipated needs.” This strategy discovers emerging consumer trends; which, in turn, drives research and development. However, the culture inside a company must value innovation and change from a competitive advantage point of view. If the building industry systematically gathered stakeholder information, it could also be used to drive profits and gain market share.
This is not just about sound strategic planning; rather it is about a mapping and anticipation process that is ongoing. Executives with anticipatory skills can be particularly helpful to an industry that is not good at predicating change, like the construction arena. One real wild card from a contextual intelligence position is carbon emission. Traditional capital gravitates to the highest return with the most surety. For the last several years the U.S. government has been enacting regulations that are providing the surety portion of funding. In addition, Wall Street is beginning to look more closely at the costs of carbon emissions. In the spring of 2007 more than 50 U.S. investors with a combined total of $4 trillion under management called on the U.S. Congress to enact legislation to curb carbon emissions. With the United States moving towards regulating emissions and Europe already imposing greenhouse gas limits, exposure to carbon changes poses a risk that could undermine competitiveness in the building sector. Proposed reforms have a sense of the ‘all’ (many sources of energy) for energy security and competitive advantage. For some in the building sector the green sources of energy and sustainability practices will be transformative with new thinking, new markets and profit gain. For leaders who lack strategic agility, the green sources will emerge as an element with a more long-term perspective that does not warrant exploration of the risks and rewards the change presents.
|
||